The stock-to-flow ratio is a scarcity metric that compares the existing quantity of an asset (“stock”) with the amount added over a period, typically one year (“flow”). A higher ratio means the stock is large relative to new supply, implying slower supply growth at current production or issuance rates.
Alternative Names / Synonyms
stock-to-flow (S2F), stock/flow ratio, inventory-to-production ratio
Why It Matters?
Stock-to-flow is a compact way to describe an asset’s supply-side dilution and the degree to which new supply can change the total outstanding quantity over time. For monetary commodities and some digital assets, where durability and long-lived inventories matter, the ratio helps compare how quickly supply expands under “normal” production or issuance conditions.
It can also inform market-structure and risk discussions. In markets where new supply is highly responsive to price (or policy), changes in the “flow” component can alter scarcity dynamics, affect expectations about future supply growth, and influence how investors frame long-term viability of an issuance regime.
Historical Context
The intuition behind stock-to-flow comes from commodity analysis, where analysts compare above-ground inventories to annual production to characterise scarcity and replenishment speed—especially for durable, storable commodities such as precious metals. In the 2010s, the same framing was adapted to certain cryptoassets because on-chain issuance schedules make “flow” mechanically defined and, in some protocols, discretely change over time (for example, periodic reductions in issuance).
Technical Explanation
At a high level, stock-to-flow is a ratio of two quantities measured in the same units.
Stock (S)
The total existing quantity considered part of supply. The precise definition depends on the asset:
Precious metals: often estimated above-ground stock (bars, coins, jewellery, and other held inventories), which can be difficult to measure precisely.
Cryptoassets: typically circulating supply (units issued and not provably burned). Some analyses adjust for estimated lost coins or illiquid holdings, but these adjustments introduce model risk.
Flow (F)
The net new quantity added over a chosen period, most commonly one year:
Commodities: annual mine production is often used; depending on the commodity, analysts may also consider recycling or net additions if destruction/consumption is relevant.
Cryptoassets: net issuance over the period (newly minted units minus any protocol-level burns, if applicable).
Time window and consistency
Stock-to-flow is usually computed on an annualised basis to align with production and issuance reporting. Using shorter windows is possible, but it increases sensitivity to seasonality, shocks, and measurement noise.
Interpretation
The ratio is dimensionless. Under a simplified “steady flow” assumption, it can be read as the number of years of current flow required to equal the existing stock. Equivalently, it is the inverse of the proportional supply growth rate over the same window.
Where it is most meaningful
Stock-to-flow tends to be most interpretable for assets with:
high durability (stock persists rather than being rapidly consumed), and
measurable inventories and production/issuance.
For consumables with rapid turnover (where “stock” is small because most output is consumed), the ratio can be low without implying that the asset is economically “non-scarce.”
Mathematical Formulation
\[
\mathrm{S2F} = \frac{S}{F_{1\mathrm{y}}}
\]
- \( \mathrm{S2F} \): stock-to-flow ratio (dimensionless).
- \( S \): current stock (total existing outstanding quantity of the asset, in units).
- \( F_{1\mathrm{y}} \): net new supply added over one year, in the same units as \(S\).
\[
g_{1\mathrm{y}} = \frac{F_{1\mathrm{y}}}{S} = \frac{1}{\mathrm{S2F}}
\]
- \( g_{1\mathrm{y}} \): proportional supply growth over one year (dimensionless; often expressed as a percentage).
- \( F_{1\mathrm{y}} \): net new supply added over one year (as above).
- \( S \): current stock (as above).
- \( \mathrm{S2F} \): stock-to-flow ratio (as above).
Worked Example
Illustrative assumptions:
- \(S\) is measured at the start of the year.
- \(F_{1\mathrm{y}}\) is the expected net addition over the next year under current conditions.
Example A (durable commodity; units: tonnes)
\[
S = 200{,}000,\qquad F_{1\mathrm{y}} = 3{,}000
\]
\[
\mathrm{S2F} = \frac{200{,}000}{3{,}000} \approx 66.67
\]
\[
g_{1\mathrm{y}} = \frac{3{,}000}{200{,}000} = 0.015 = 1.5\%
\]
Example B (protocol-issued asset; units: tokens)
\[
S = 20{,}000{,}000,\qquad F_{1\mathrm{y}} = 200{,}000
\]
\[
\mathrm{S2F} = \frac{20{,}000{,}000}{200{,}000} = 100
\]
\[
g_{1\mathrm{y}} = \frac{200{,}000}{20{,}000{,}000} = 0.01 = 1\%
\]
Visual Illustration
Where It's Used?
Commodity research for durable, storable goods (notably monetary metals such as gold and silver)
Resource economics and extractive industry analysis (inventory and production comparisons)
Cryptoasset issuance analysis (scheduled supply expansion, net issuance, dilution framing)
Macro and monetary research comparing supply growth characteristics across “store-of-value” candidates
Tokenomics reviews where net issuance depends on emissions, burns, or policy parameters
Security / Trade-offs
Criticisms / Limitations
Not a valuation model: Stock-to-flow describes supply-side scarcity, but does not incorporate demand, utility, liquidity, credit risk, governance risk, or substitution effects.
Stock is often uncertain: Above-ground inventories are estimated, may be incomplete, and can differ by methodology. For cryptoassets, choices such as “circulating vs. total vs. free-float,” and how to treat lost or inaccessible units, can materially change SSS.
Flow can be endogenous or regime-dependent: Commodity production can respond to price, technology, regulation, or capital availability; crypto issuance rules can change via governance or protocol upgrades; some assets have discrete issuance steps.
Durability matters: For consumable commodities with rapid turnover, “stock” is not a stable store-of-value inventory, so S2F can be low without being especially informative about economic scarcity.
Statistical misuse risk: Using S2F as a stand-alone explanatory variable for price can lead to overconfident conclusions, especially when both price and supply metrics trend over time and sample sizes are limited.
Net vs. gross supply changes: Focusing only on gross issuance may miss burns, buybacks, or other mechanisms that change net supply, and it ignores distributional effects (who receives new supply).
Further Reading
World Gold Council — gold supply and stock-related data: https://www.gold.org/goldhub/data
U.S. Geological Survey — Mineral Commodity Summaries (production and supply context): https://www.usgs.gov/centers/national-minerals-information-center/mineral-commodity-summaries
Satoshi Nakamoto (2008) — Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (issuance schedule context): https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Bitcoin Core repository (reference implementation of supply rules in code): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
Bird Capital is a private investment office managing proprietary capital through Bird Marketing Limited. We do not manage third-party funds and are not authorized or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The information provided on this website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a financial promotion, investment advice, or an offer to the public. No investment services are being offered or solicited. Company Number: 08051880. Registered Address: 27 Old Gloucester Street, London, WC1N 3AX, United Kingdom.